Severity 3 — Serious🔴 corruption2018

"Martyr Payments" to Security Prisoners, Including Those Convicted of Attacks on Civilians

The PA operates a welfare fund paying monthly stipends to Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails and to families of those killed in the conflict, with payment amounts that scale upward with sentence length — meaning those convicted of killing Israeli civilians can receive more than those serving shorter sentences. The US State Department and NGO Monitor have documented and criticized the practice as incentivizing violence; the 2018 US Taylor Force Act cut American aid to the PA over it. The PA maintains the payments are a welfare obligation to the families of prisoners and casualties, comparable to how many governments support the families of those imprisoned or killed in a national conflict.

F

Mahmoud Abbas — Fatah (Palestinian Authority — West Bank only from 2007)

In power 2005–present

What happened

The Palestinian Martyrs and Prisoners Affairs Authority pays a base monthly stipend to all Palestinians in Israeli prisons regardless of the offence, with amounts that increase in bands tied to sentence length — a prisoner serving 5 years receives more than one serving 1, and a prisoner serving a life sentence for killing Israelis receives more than either. In 2019, PA officials disclosed the payments consumed roughly $174 million annually, a substantial share of the PA's total budget and, at the time, a larger line item than its entire health ministry allocation, which is part of why critics argue the structure functions as a de facto incentive rather than a neutral welfare programme, since the amount paid correlates directly with the severity of the underlying offence rather than genuine need.

The Taylor Force Act, named for an American army veteran killed in a 2016 Tel Aviv stabbing attack, required the US to cut an amount of aid to the PA equivalent to what the PA spent on these payments each year, and was passed with bipartisan support in Congress specifically over this issue — a rare instance of US legislation naming a specific foreign government payment programme as a condition for aid. The PA's counter-argument has real substance too: prisoners' families lose their primary breadwinner regardless of the offence, and many other governments, including Israel's own, provide some form of ongoing support to the families of people convicted or killed in relation to national conflicts. What distinguishes the Palestinian programme in critics' eyes is specifically the sentence-length scaling, which ties higher payments to more severe attacks on civilians rather than applying a flat welfare rate — a structural design choice the PA has not changed despite the sustained international pressure and aid losses it has caused.

Source

US Department of State — Country Reports: West Bank and Gaza (Prisoner Payments)

🌍 See this event in context

This event is one entry in Palestine's accountability record. Open the interactive map to see the full timeline, polling data, and every documented event.

🌍 View on the map